#Affinity photo linux how to
#Affinity photo linux update
#Affinity photo linux software
#Affinity photo linux license

That could change, but it would mean developing new anti-piracy protections & update mechanisms for the Mac versions (because that is provided by Apple for all apps sold through MAS), which in turn would mean passing those development costs on to users, maintaining multiple versions of the Mac apps, & so on.

#Affinity photo linux license

For security & privacy reasons, Apple does not share buyer information with MAS sellers, so as things stand now there is no way to sell a cross-platform license because Serif does not know who specifically is buying the Mac versions. It has been mentioned countless times in these forums that the Mac versions are sold only through the Mac App Store ('MAS') & the Windows versions only through Serif's own store. So instead of selling Windows Affinity for $100 they could sell it for $200 but give users access to Mac and Linux downloads. Perhaps they can sell Affinity products with optional cross-platform at higher price tag . Try and get a list of a few thousand Linux users who would be willing to buy Affinity Photo. Lots of outlets for PCsĪs an example, why not try to get a petition going. Mac is easy, the Mac Store, let Apple do it. The point is, Serif is a commercial company, they have to sell. How do you market to Linux users ? Get into the Linux ecosystem now Affinity. They have an opportunity to secure a dominance and solidify a future user base almost unchallenged. Lack of any real challengers in Linux the environment will be very beneficial to Affinity. This is changing fast as they move to a culture of flat design principles and easy OS installations.

Linux has had a long record of poor UI implementations. More and more people will be going to Linux in the future to escape the giant corporations increasingly toxic ecosystems. Also they cost more (app wise), devour privacy, and become less secure. Both work on Ubuntu, but snaps is out of the box, and Flatpak needs to be installed by the user in this distro, so I think snaps are more attractive to my argument.I think Affinity needs to get involved in the Linux community for 3 reasons.Īs Microsoft, Apple, and Google tighten their monopoly, they become less innovative. Snaps it's the model created by Ubuntu's parent company Canonical, and Flatpaks is the model patrocinated by RedHat.

#Affinity photo linux software

In short, those two methods are like how apps are wrapped on android, not exactly like, but comparable, it wrap the software and all his necessary libraries and deliver it to the user packed up, they can even sandbox the software to run on a higher level of security, both are really similar.

#Affinity photo linux how to

I think I expressed myself correctly and transmited my argument in a constructive way.īIG PS: If the counter-argument its about what distro to use and how to deliver the software: You could stick with Ubuntu and use Snappy or Flatpak wrappers to distribute the program. To emphasize this point, Photoshop reigns supreme on Windows and Affinity is currently the underdog, on Linux this wouldn't be the case, Gimp exist, yes, but it not at the same level as professional applications on windows and mac. He said that it would cost 500k to port it, and it wouldn't compensate because of the small linux user base, my argument is that: Although the Linux user base is smaller than Windows, Affinity Photo would become the primary option to linux users all over the world, and potentially impulse others to migrate do linux knowing that they wouldn't need to rely on Wine to use photoshop, because of a better option being Affinity Photo and Design. Some time ago I saw a post here on the forum asking about a linux port of Photo, someone responded as being one of the devs, I don't know if he was one of them or not.